Heating and Ventilating

 

Copper ban prompts search for alternative anti-legionella water treatment

The use of elemental copper has been banned as a biocide, particularly for legionella control, following a review by the EU under the Biocidal Products Directive.
From 1 February, it will be illegal to market or use elemental copper as a biocide in water treatment systems or to supply the copper needed for their use. The action has been taken at EU level because no manufacturer supported biocidal use of elemental copper during a review period that ended in September 2011.

However, HSE is applying to the European Commission for an 'essential use derogation' to allow for the continued use of copper in legionella control systems within the UK. Until the outcome of its application is known, HSE says its primary concern is that legionella control is not compromised and it will take 'a sensible and proportionate approach to enforcement if we come across these systems after 1 February 2013'.

HSE says 'the focus of any enforcement activity will be on the failure to control the risk of exposure to legionella bacteria and the likelihood of legionnaire's disease developing in a given situation'.
In addition, it emphasises that businesses and organisations still have a responsibility to manage the risks from legionella and 'it is essential that they continue to meet these duties'.

In the meantime, property managers responsible for public buildings are being forced to carry out urgent reviews and source alternative water treatments.

Bob Wilson, principal of Meadowhead Consultancy, a leading independent expert on the efficacy of anti-legionella treatments, has been examining the options available to building managers. 'From owners of apartments, office blocks, shopping centres to hospitals, hotels, schools, factories and sports arenas, facilities managers of these premises must take action immediately.'

He said: 'L8, the legislation and Approved Code of Practice for the control of Legionella, only mentions two possibilities for continuous dosing of building water system. These are firstly, chlorine dioxide and secondly, copper/silver ionization. The demise of copper/silver ionisation suggests that chlorine dioxide is the only viable alternative.'

'Chlorine dioxide is a toxic gas which must be produced by mixing two chemicals. The gas is then introduced into the water system. This requires expensive dosing equipment to ensure this is done safely. Chlorine dioxide is known to be corrosive, and long term dosing will result in an increased maintenance spend. The product gases off in calorifiers, resulting in inadequate treatment and possible legionella proliferation,' he added.

Mr Wilson concludes: 'As silver may be added to the water, the best treatment is probably one that combines hydrogen peroxide and activated silver such as EndoSan. This was used at the London 2012 Olympics, instead of chlorine, to disinfect athletes' ice baths, therapy, treatment and training pools. It is also widely used for one-off disinfections and increasingly, as a continuous dose chemical.'

Phil Buchanan, managing director of Endo Enterprises, the company that produces EndoSan, said: 'Following risk assessment in compliance with L8, many water treatment facilities, estates management groups, and health care operators, utilise EndoSan and our Constant Dosing system as the preferred method of legionella control, throughout the UK.'

For more information on the biocidal use of elemental copper visit http://www.hse.gov.uk/legionnaires/index.htm

Visit http://endoenterprises.com/index.php/facilities-management/ for more information about EndoSan



Follow HVROnlineEditor on Twitter
21 January 2013

Comments

By Darren Magee
21 January 2013 00:03:00
For a little clarity, as I understand it, the use of silver in the EndoSan product is not in question from a performance perspective, it is not used for that purpose, with an absolute minute amount of soluble silver (ppb)as a stabiliser, passing the stringent NSF and DWI toxicological reviews, this makesits use globally extremely safe, it is also 100% biodegradable. This HuwaSan based technology has proved to be exponentially more effective than other peroxide technology.
As with any leading edge science, one would expect to find less references, we found this the case in the NHS however now in countless and longstanding studies and in use for many years, EndoSan has performed consistently and remarkably as an effective legionella control solution. I think we will see its use grow within the NHS, one of our hospitals uses the product to effectively disinfect its water borehole and a registered medical device version of the product is available to safely disinfect birthing pools, therapy pools and baths.
As an alternative to copper silver ionisation, it is not surprising the opportunity to highlight the benefits of the technology has been taken, one must consider the use of thermal and chlorine based disinfection is well established. I suppose we must remember that when the L8 ACOP was written silver hydrogen peroxide technology was just emerging.
I can tell you that when we referred questions on the use of the technology to the HSE, the feedback was extremely positive.
By Jane Cooper
21 January 2013 00:02:00
I too am dismayed to read these remarks which display a basic lack of understanding of chlorine dioxide and its application to water systems. The use of silver is also open to question as results have been inconsistent and peroxide is notoriously poor as a biocide except in high doses.
I am not a chemical supplier and would like to see a balanced view presented.
By Graham Thompson
21 January 2013 00:01:00
I am surprised to see this headline and suspect that it is almost scandalous; the reference to particularly for legionella control has no foundation. As is pointed out below the headline, the HSE will be taking an informative and sensible view towards the use of copper and silver. The article then refers to Chlorine Dioxide as a toxic gas (fair enough). However, most dosing plants produce weak solutions that are in no way dangerous. The statement then goes on to suggest Hydrogen Peroxide (with silver) which I believe is currently the least well referenced disinfectant, with several studies showing very poor performance compared to something as simple as Chlorine. I do not sell chemicals or benefit from their sale and suggest this is opportunist advertising.
Already Registered?
Login
Not Yet Registered?
Register

FETA welcomes guests to Annual Luncheon

The 2024 FETA Annual Luncheon took place on Thursday 11th April and attracted guests from across the heating, ventilation, building controls, refrigeration and air conditioning industries as well as individuals from related institutions, ...

  25-Apr-2024

Prizes galore to be won on Conex Bänninger’s interactive stand

Conex Bänninger, a global leader in the manufacture of high-quality fittings, valves and accessories, will have an enhanced interactive stand (5D19) at InstallerShow 2024....

  25-Apr-2024

STOKVIS R600

CONDENSING ULTRA LOW NOx PREMIX COMMERCIAL BOILER
  10-Jan-2019
Heating & Ventilating Review is the number one magazine in the HVAR industry. Don’t miss out, subscribe today!
Subcribe to HVR

Diary

HVR Awards 2024
https://www.heatingandventilating.net/copper-ban-prompts-search-for-alternative-anti-legionella-water-treatment